Appendix H — Program Atlas
Each sheet to the 8-section template + 4-point QA bar (defined inline in Vol III App H Education, the format-reference sector).
Read this chapter in the interactive reader, or download the full 601-page manifesto (PDF).
The People’s Model
Manifesto v2026
Volume III — Implementation Handbook
Appendix H — Program Atlas
Media & Info Integrity sector — sheets H.181–H.198 (v1.0)
Each sheet to the 8-section template + 4-point QA bar (defined inline in Vol III App H Education, the format-reference sector).
Problem
Karnataka’s proactive disclosure under RTI Sec. 4 is uneven. What the state publishes by default is unclear and frequently lags.
Program design
- Statewide Public Information Charter listing every department × dataset × publication cadence.
- Default-publish discipline; RTI requests on listed items auto-answered with a public link.
- Annual revision with civil-society consultation.
- KIC certifies compliance.
Owning agency
Lead: Karnataka State Information Commission + Dept of Personnel & Administrative Reforms
Backup: Department of IT, BT & Science
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹30-60 cr / year
Source: State Budget; RTI implementation share.
Payment trigger: Per-dataset publication audit + RTI-volume trend.
KPIs
- • Departments compliant with Charter publication — baseline: Partial; F: All departments on core categories; B: All departments / all categories; C: Continuous + KIC certified.
- • RTI applications on already-published items — baseline: High share; F: Falling trajectory; B: Material decline; C: Minimal — disclosure pre-empts.
- • Publication-within-window compliance — baseline: (new); F: ≥80%; B: ≥95%; C: ≥98%.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Selective publication. Safeguard: KIC oversight; whistleblower channels; published non-compliance data.
- • Risk: Capture by political messaging. Safeguard: Statutory categories list; civil-society review; non-partisan governance.
- • Risk: Data publication revealing privacy patterns. Safeguard: Aggregation rules; Citizen Data Trust certification.
Dependencies
- • Vol II Ch 17 Sec. 17.2.
- • App H sheets H.107, H.130, H.183, H.193.
Problem
Karnataka government advertising spend is uneven in disclosure; the propaganda boundary is unclear. Public trust suffers.
Program design
- Statutory advertising-spend disclosure rules — by month, outlet, category.
- Annual spend caps per category.
- Anti-propaganda rules with auditable definitions.
- Independent audit and published findings.
Owning agency
Lead: Department of Information & Public Relations
Backup: Karnataka State Information Commission (transparency oversight)
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹20-50 cr / year (compliance + audit)
Source: State Budget; advertising-spend within ceiling.
Payment trigger: Monthly disclosure + audit completion.
KPIs
- • Monthly disclosure publication compliance — baseline: Patchy; F: 100% by quarter; B: 100% by month; C: 100% with annual audit.
- • Independent-audit pass rate — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: ≥85% pass; C: ≥95% pass.
- • Spending-cap adherence — baseline: (new); F: Baselined per category; B: 100% within cap; C: 100% with audit.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Concealed spend via subsidiary routes. Safeguard: Subsidiary disclosure rules; CAG audit; KIC oversight.
- • Risk: Vendor capture on advertising contracts. Safeguard: Open bidder-floor; rotation; concentration audit.
- • Risk: Propaganda-line drift. Safeguard: Statutory definitions; independent peer review; published violations.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.181, H.197.
Problem
Karnataka government open data is partial and uneven in quality. Civic-tech reuse potential is constrained.
Program design
- Statewide Open Data Portal with versioned datasets and documented APIs.
- Default-publish under Public Information Charter (sheet H.181).
- Developer engagement and key issuance.
- Citizen Data Trust review of high-risk datasets.
Owning agency
Lead: Department of IT, BT & Science
Backup: Karnataka State Information Commission
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹60-100 cr / year
Source: State Budget; convergence with NDSAP.
Payment trigger: Per-dataset publication + API-consumption data.
KPIs
- • Datasets published vs Charter list — baseline: Partial; F: ≥70%; B: ≥95%; C: 100% with refresh.
- • API consumption (calls per month) — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: Material developer use; C: Sustained ecosystem.
- • Citizen-tech apps built on portal data — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: ≥10 with material user base; C: Sustained pipeline.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Misuse for surveillance / profiling. Safeguard: Trust review of high-risk datasets; aggregation rules.
- • Risk: Single-developer capture. Safeguard: Open onboarding; rate limits; representation rules.
- • Risk: Data accuracy gaps. Safeguard: Version-controlled publication; correction channel; sample audit.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.130, H.181, H.147.
Problem
Karnataka misinformation events (election, crisis, communal-tension) get slow / inconsistent response. Correction often arrives too late.
Program design
- Standing protocol — detect → verify → correct → publish-evidence.
- Cross-platform correction push.
- Pre-event preparation for elections / major events.
- Independent fact-checker partnership (sheet H.190).
Owning agency
Lead: Department of Information & Public Relations + Karnataka State SOC
Backup: Karnataka State Election Commission (election windows)
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹30-60 cr / year
Source: State Budget; central convergence.
Payment trigger: Per-incident response time + correction-reach evidence.
KPIs
- • Detect-to-correction time — baseline: Variable; F: ≤24 h median; B: ≤6 h; C: ≤2 h.
- • Correction-reach ratio vs original — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: ≥50% reach; C: ≥75% reach.
- • Pre-event preparation completion (elections) — baseline: (new); F: Live; B: Routine; C: Sustained capability.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Correction perceived as state propaganda. Safeguard: Independent fact-checker certification; methodology published.
- • Risk: Over-broad classification of dissent as misinfo. Safeguard: Statutory definition limits; appeal pathway; Trust oversight.
- • Risk: Platform non-cooperation. Safeguard: Statutory framework; published cooperation data.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.185, H.190, H.194.
Problem
Karnataka faces rising deepfake threats — political, financial-fraud, identity-abuse. Response capability is thin.
Program design
- Deepfake detection capability (state SOC integration).
- Rapid takedown coordination with platforms.
- Victim support (especially women, public figures, children).
- Public-awareness education.
Owning agency
Lead: Karnataka State SOC + KSP Cybercrime
Backup: Karnataka State Police Cyber Forensics Lab
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹40-80 cr / year
Source: State Budget; CERT-In convergence.
Payment trigger: Per-incident detection + response evidence.
KPIs
- • Detection-to-takedown coordination time — baseline: (new); F: ≤24 h; B: ≤6 h; C: ≤2 h.
- • Victim support response time — baseline: (new); F: ≤48 h; B: ≤12 h; C: ≤4 h.
- • Public-awareness reach (sessions per quarter) — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: Material reach; C: Sustained engagement.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Detection tool false-positives. Safeguard: Human-in-the-loop verification; appeal pathway.
- • Risk: Over-broad takedown harming legitimate satire. Safeguard: Definitional boundaries; appeal mechanism.
- • Risk: Platform non-cooperation. Safeguard: Statutory framework; escalation pathway.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.150, H.184, H.197.
Problem
Karnataka crisis communication (disaster, outbreak, security incident) is improvised. Information vacuum gets filled by speculation.
Program design
- Statewide Crisis Communication Standards Document.
- Pre-built response templates and channels.
- Trained spokesperson cadre.
- Real-time public dashboards during incidents.
Owning agency
Lead: Department of Information & Public Relations + Karnataka State Disaster Management Authority
Backup: Karnataka State SOC (for cyber incidents)
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹30-60 cr / year
Source: State Budget; convergence with NDMF.
Payment trigger: Per-event communication evidence + post-event review.
KPIs
- • Time from incident-declaration to first communication — baseline: Variable; F: ≤60 min; B: ≤30 min; C: ≤15 min.
- • Communication-frequency during incident (per protocol) — baseline: (new); F: Per-protocol adherence; B: Sustained; C: Continuous capability.
- • Post-event communication audit pass rate — baseline: (new); F: ≥80%; B: ≥95%; C: ≥98%.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Information suppression to manage panic. Safeguard: Statutory transparency standards; KIC oversight; whistleblower protection.
- • Risk: Over-confident initial statements. Safeguard: Standard caveats; uncertainty acknowledgement protocol.
- • Risk: Spokesperson capture by political messaging. Safeguard: Cadre training; non-partisan content rules.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.089, H.149, H.184.
Problem
Karnataka school curriculum addresses media literacy unevenly. Students enter adult life without tools to critically engage information.
Program design
- Media-literacy modules integrated into Class 6–12 civics curriculum.
- Teacher training under Teacher Professional Cadre (sheet H.002).
- Practical exercises — verification, source-checking, prebunking.
- Independent academic board curates content (Vol III Ch 21 safeguard 1).
Owning agency
Lead: Department of School Education & Literacy + DSERT
Backup: Karnataka State Civic Network (sheet H.142)
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹50-90 cr / year
Source: State Budget; NEP convergence.
Payment trigger: Per-school curriculum delivery + assessment evidence.
KPIs
- • Schools covering media-literacy curriculum — baseline: (new); F: ≥70%; B: ≥95%; C: 100%.
- • Teachers trained on media-literacy — baseline: (new); F: ≥60%; B: ≥90%; C: 100% with refresh.
- • Student practical-assessment pass rate — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: Rising trajectory; C: Sustained capability.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Partisan content capture. Safeguard: Independent academic board (Vol III Ch 21 safeguard 1).
- • Risk: Teacher capacity gap. Safeguard: Cadre training; sheet H.002 convergence.
- • Risk: Out-of-school youth missed. Safeguard: Convergence with sheet H.188 (community programmes).
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.002, H.142, H.188.
Problem
Karnataka adults — particularly seniors, low-literacy, and digitally-new users — face information manipulation risks. Reach beyond schools is limited.
Program design
- Community media-literacy modules delivered via PSC and libraries.
- Audio + visual + voice-channel delivery.
- Periodic refresh cycle.
- Convergence with sheet H.151 Digital Literacy.
Owning agency
Lead: Department of Public Libraries + Department of Rural Development
Backup: Karnataka State Civic Network
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹60-100 cr / year
Source: State Budget; partnership funding.
Payment trigger: Per-session delivery + participation data.
KPIs
- • Adults reached per year — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: Material reach; C: Sustained universal coverage.
- • Participant comprehension (post-session) — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: Rising trajectory; C: Sustained capability.
- • Misinformation reporting rate post-programme — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: Material rise (signalling literacy); C: Sustained engagement.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Generic content with low impact. Safeguard: Local-context modules; trusted-intermediary delivery; periodic refresh.
- • Risk: Capture by political messaging. Safeguard: Independent academic board; non-partisan rules.
- • Risk: Digital-divide exclusion. Safeguard: Voice + visual; trusted-intermediary delivery.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.109, H.151, H.187.
Problem
Karnataka local journalism is under fiscal stress; district / vernacular reporting capacity has thinned. The watchdog function suffers.
Program design
- State-anchored arm’s-length grant fund for local journalism.
- Independent governance — not under any ministry direct control.
- Open application; transparent selection.
- Output-based accountability without editorial influence.
Owning agency
Lead: Department of Information & Public Relations (with statutory independence frame)
Backup: Independent governance board
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹60-100 cr / year
Source: State Budget; statutory fund.
Payment trigger: Per-grant disbursement + output evidence.
KPIs
- • Districts with supported journalism outlets — baseline: (new); F: ≥15 districts; B: All 31; C: Sustained ecosystem.
- • Vernacular-language outlet support coverage — baseline: (new); F: Baselined per language; B: Material coverage; C: Sustained ecosystem.
- • Editorial-influence-complaint resolution — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: Material rare cases; C: Sustained independence.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Editorial-influence creep. Safeguard: Statutory independence; published governance; whistleblower protection.
- • Risk: Captured grant allocation. Safeguard: Open application; rotation; conflict-of-interest register.
- • Risk: Funded-outlet bias toward state messaging. Safeguard: Output-based — not message-based — accountability; periodic external review.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.191, H.192, H.197.
Problem
Karnataka has no organised, state-supported fact-checker ecosystem to handle misinformation at scale.
Program design
- State-supported fact-checker network under independent governance.
- Methodology standards published.
- Cross-platform correction integration.
- Multi-language coverage (Kannada + minority languages).
Owning agency
Lead: Department of Information & Public Relations (with independence frame)
Backup: Independent governance board
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹30-60 cr / year
Source: State Budget; statutory fund.
Payment trigger: Per-fact-check completion + correction-reach evidence.
KPIs
- • Fact-checks published per month — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: Material throughput; C: Sustained.
- • Multi-language coverage — baseline: (new); F: Kannada + English + 2 minority; B: + all major minorities; C: Continuous.
- • Methodology peer-review pass rate — baseline: (new); F: ≥80%; B: ≥95%; C: ≥98%.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Bias toward political opponents. Safeguard: Independent governance; published methodology; sampled peer review.
- • Risk: Reach gap vs misinfo origin. Safeguard: Cross-platform integration; correction-reach tracking.
- • Risk: Fact-checker safety risk. Safeguard: Journalist safety protocol (sheet H.191).
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.184, H.185, H.189.
Problem
Karnataka journalists, particularly those reporting on power and corruption, face safety risks. Response is uneven.
Program design
- Journalist Safety Protocol — incident-response, threat-assessment, witness protection extension.
- Trained KSP point-of-contact in every district.
- Statutory protection extension to journalists doing public-interest work.
- Public reporting on incidents handled.
Owning agency
Lead: Karnataka State Police + Department of Information & Public Relations
Backup: Karnataka State Human Rights Commission
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹30-60 cr / year
Source: State Budget; central convergence.
Payment trigger: Per-incident response + post-incident evidence.
KPIs
- • Incident response time — baseline: Variable; F: ≤24 h; B: ≤8 h; C: ≤4 h.
- • Threat-assessment-to-protection-decision time — baseline: (new); F: ≤72 h; B: ≤24 h; C: ≤8 h.
- • Independent verification of incident handling — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: ≥85% verified pass; C: ≥95%.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: State-side perpetrator cases. Safeguard: KSHRC independent investigation; escalation pathway.
- • Risk: Selective protection. Safeguard: Statutory criteria; published decisions; appeal pathway.
- • Risk: Surveillance creep under safety framing. Safeguard: Strict access controls; Trust review; sunset clauses.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.100, H.190, H.107.
Problem
Karnataka’s public-broadcaster relationship with the state can be opaque. Independence requires structural design, not just promises.
Program design
- Statutory independence framework for state-supported broadcasting.
- Independent governance board — fixed-term, not removable at executive will.
- Editorial-independence rules with statutory teeth.
- Public-interest mandate published.
Owning agency
Lead: Department of Information & Public Relations + statutory broadcaster
Backup: Independent governance board
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹80-130 cr / year
Source: State Budget; broadcaster revenue.
Payment trigger: Annual editorial-independence audit + governance evidence.
KPIs
- • Independent-audit pass on editorial independence — baseline: (new); F: Annual audit live; B: ≥85% pass; C: ≥95% pass.
- • Public-interest programming share of output — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: ≥30%; C: Sustained.
- • Independent-board composition compliance — baseline: (new); F: 100%; B: 100%; C: Continuous + rotation discipline.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Political pressure on programming. Safeguard: Statutory independence; published interference attempts; whistleblower protection.
- • Risk: Board capture by faction. Safeguard: Diverse selection; rotation; conflict-of-interest register.
- • Risk: Revenue dependence distorting editorial. Safeguard: Funding diversification; transparent revenue accounting.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.189, H.197.
Problem
Karnataka State Information Commission is under-resourced relative to RTI caseload. Delays in disposal compound the rights gap.
Program design
- Cadre + capacity + technology strengthening.
- Penalty enforcement on non-compliant PIOs.
- Annual performance report.
- Independent oversight of own performance.
Owning agency
Lead: Karnataka State Information Commission
Backup: Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹40-70 cr / year
Source: State Budget; statutory body funding.
Payment trigger: Per-RTI disposition + penalty action.
KPIs
- • Median RTI disposal time — baseline: Slow; F: ≤90 days; B: ≤45 days; C: ≤30 days.
- • Penalty enforcement rate on non-compliant PIOs — baseline: Low; F: Baselined; B: Material rise; C: Sustained credible enforcement.
- • Commissioner vacancy duration — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: ≤30 days; C: ≤14 days.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Vacancy gaps slowing disposal. Safeguard: Statutory time-limit on appointments; published vacancy data.
- • Risk: Capture by appointing authority. Safeguard: Independent appointment criteria; non-removal protection.
- • Risk: Penalty under-enforcement. Safeguard: Statutory mandate; published enforcement; whistleblower protection.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.107, H.181.
Problem
Karnataka election + crisis windows produce predictable misinformation patterns. Pre-bunking — inoculation before exposure — is more effective than debunking after.
Program design
- Standing playbook for pre-bunking around predictable events.
- Multi-platform delivery in plain language + Kannada + minority languages.
- Independent academic curation of content.
- Cross-state cooperation where applicable.
Owning agency
Lead: Karnataka State Election Commission (election windows) + Department of Information & Public Relations
Backup: Independent academic board
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹30-50 cr / year
Source: State Budget; partnership funding.
Payment trigger: Per-event campaign delivery + reach data.
KPIs
- • Pre-event campaigns run per cycle — baseline: (new); F: All major elections + 2 crises; B: All predictable events; C: Continuous capability.
- • Reach (sessions per district per event) — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: Material reach; C: Sustained engagement.
- • Independent-verification pass on content — baseline: (new); F: Annual; B: Per-event; C: Continuous.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Pre-bunking captured by ruling-party messaging. Safeguard: Independent academic curation; non-partisan rules; statutory framework.
- • Risk: Over-broad targeting. Safeguard: Defined event triggers; transparent methodology.
- • Risk: Counter-productive framing. Safeguard: Research-based content; A/B testing; user-feedback.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.184, H.187, H.190.
Problem
Karnataka residents often don’t know what schemes they’re entitled to, how to apply, or where to follow up. Awareness gap creates inclusion error.
Program design
- Scheme-finder + entitlement-explorer on People’s App.
- Voice + visual channels.
- PSC + library + community-channel delivery.
- Convergence with Proactive Enrolment (sheet H.167).
Owning agency
Lead: Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms
Backup: Department of Information & Public Relations
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹30-60 cr / year
Source: State Budget; convergence with DBT infrastructure.
Payment trigger: Per-tool usage + application-uplift data.
KPIs
- • Scheme-finder usage (sessions per month) — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: Material engagement; C: Routine reference.
- • Application-uplift attributable to tool — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: Material rise; C: Sustained inclusion gain.
- • Coverage of state-supported schemes — baseline: (new); F: ≥50%; B: ≥95%; C: 100% with refresh.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Information overload reducing use. Safeguard: Personalised filtering; assisted-access pathway.
- • Risk: Data accuracy gap (outdated info). Safeguard: Refresh cadence; departmental responsibility; correction channel.
- • Risk: Privacy disclosure through use patterns. Safeguard: Trust review; aggregation-only analytics.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.109, H.151, H.167.
Problem
Karnataka government content (forms, dashboards, communications, learning material) skews to Kannada + English; minority-language content lags.
Program design
- State-anchored Multilingual Content Production unit.
- Open-licensed content where feasible.
- Translation cadre with quality + cultural-sensitivity protocols.
- Convergence with sheets H.164 (Captioning) + H.175 (Linguistic Minority).
Owning agency
Lead: Department of Kannada & Culture + Department of Minorities Welfare
Backup: Department of Information & Public Relations
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹50-90 cr / year
Source: State Budget; central minorities-content convergence.
Payment trigger: Per-language content production + reach data.
KPIs
- • State content available in target languages — baseline: Variable; F: Kannada 100% + 3 minorities; B: + all major minorities; C: All Karnataka languages with sufficient demand.
- • Translation-quality audit pass rate — baseline: (new); F: ≥85%; B: ≥95%; C: ≥98%.
- • Minority-language audience reach (sessions per language) — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: Material reach; C: Sustained engagement.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Translation captured by single school. Safeguard: Open empanelment; rotation; community review.
- • Risk: Cultural-sensitivity gaps. Safeguard: Community-co-authorship; user-feedback channel.
- • Risk: Language-politicisation. Safeguard: Demand-data-driven priority; statutory framework.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.164, H.175.
Problem
Karnataka press freedom faces pressures from state and non-state actors. State-side commitments to non-interference need to be visible.
Program design
- Statutory non-interference commitments published.
- Anti-SLAPP framework for journalists facing strategic litigation.
- Police protocols for media access at public events.
- Convergence with Journalist Safety (sheet H.191).
Owning agency
Lead: Department of Home + Department of Information & Public Relations
Backup: Karnataka State Human Rights Commission
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹20-40 cr / year
Source: State Budget.
Payment trigger: Per-incident handling + protocol-compliance evidence.
KPIs
- • Media-access incidents at public events resolved within SLA — baseline: (new); F: ≥80%; B: ≥95%; C: ≥98%.
- • Anti-SLAPP cases assisted — baseline: (new); F: Baselined; B: Material support; C: Sustained capability.
- • State-interference complaints (with disposition) — baseline: (new); F: Reporting matured; B: Decline trajectory; C: Sustained low.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: State-side prosecution misuse. Safeguard: Statutory non-interference; independent oversight.
- • Risk: Selective protection. Safeguard: Published criteria; non-partisan application.
- • Risk: Non-state-actor pressure unaddressed. Safeguard: Cross-reference with Journalist Safety (H.191); KSHRC investigation.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.189, H.191, H.192.
Problem
Karnataka information ecosystem health — proactive disclosure, advertising discipline, journalism support, fact-checking, misinformation incidents — is rarely consolidated for public accountability.
Program design
- Annual Information Integrity Report consolidating across sheets H.181–H.197.
- Published with KIC certification.
- Independent peer review.
- Recommendations tracked through to closure.
Owning agency
Lead: Karnataka State Information Commission
Backup: Independent academic board
Funding model
Annual cost band: ₹20-40 cr / year
Source: State Budget; statutory body funding.
Payment trigger: Annual publication + recommendation closure.
KPIs
- • Annual publication within window — baseline: (new); F: Annual; B: Annual with quality; C: Continuous reference.
- • Recommendations closed within target — baseline: (new); F: ≥70%; B: ≥90%; C: ≥95%.
- • Peer-review pass rate — baseline: (new); F: ≥80%; B: ≥95%; C: ≥98%.
Standard risk controls
- • Risk: Findings suppression. Safeguard: Statutory publication; KIC independence; whistleblower protection.
- • Risk: Methodology drift. Safeguard: Open methodology; consistency audit.
- • Risk: Politicisation of findings. Safeguard: Statutory independence; non-partisan governance.
Dependencies
- • App H sheets H.181–H.197 (the cross-cut of the Media sector).
Architecture cross-reference
Architecture cross-reference — sector sheets to architectural sheets
Each program sheet in this sector references the operating architecture defined in Vol I Ch 2 and App H CyberDPI sheets H.230–H.233. Specifically: financial flows from this sector’s programs are published through the Open Ledger (sector-specific data fields per App D) anchored to KSSL (sheet H.230). Time-series outcome data and sector dashboards are published on the Karnataka Open Data Portal (sheet H.233). Personal data flows (where applicable) are governed by the Citizen Consent Ledger (sheet H.232). Security audit and incident response across this sector’s systems falls under the statutory CSOC (sheet H.231).
H.181 — MEDIA — Public Information Charter (binding)
H.182 — MEDIA — Government Advertising Rules & Disclosure
H.183 — MEDIA — Open Data Portal (Citizen Tech alignment)
H.184 — MEDIA — Misinformation Response Protocol
H.185 — MEDIA — Deepfake & Synthetic Media Response
H.186 — MEDIA — Crisis Communication Standards
H.187 — MEDIA — Media Literacy in Schools
H.188 — MEDIA — Community Media Literacy at Panchayat Level
H.189 — MEDIA — Local Journalism Support Fund (Arm’s-length)
H.190 — MEDIA — Fact-checker Network (Independent Governance)
H.191 — MEDIA — Journalist Safety & Reporting Protocol
H.192 — MEDIA — Public Service Broadcasting Governance
H.193 — MEDIA — Karnataka State Information Commission Strengthening
H.194 — MEDIA — Pre-Bunking Campaigns (Election & Crisis)
H.195 — MEDIA — Civic Information for Welfare & Entitlements
H.196 — MEDIA — Multilingual Content Production (Kannada + minority lang)
H.197 — MEDIA — Press Freedom Protection (within state remit)
H.198 — MEDIA — Information Integrity Annual Report
← Appendix H — Program Atlas · Appendix H — Program Atlas →
This is a chapter of The People's Model manifesto for Karnataka — published in full for public review. Every claim may be challenged: write to [email protected].